Post by HiTemp on Jul 25, 2014 7:11:16 GMT -7
A while back I was hesitant to back this guy though I thought he had some good ideas. This is why I don't feel you can trust a politician who isn't willing to lay his platform out for the voters clearly and unambiguously. If they don't, you can rest assured you're going to get a morph into something you weren't looking to support.
Rand Pauls veers off party line
Anyone, and I mean anyone, who tries to tell me that having an ID card to vote is an imposition is, ipso facto, an idiot. For that to be true, I have to believe the same supposedly impositioned people have no bank account, never travel on an airplane or AMTRACK, never get a driver's license, never stay in a hotel or motel, never purchase a firearm, never purchase alcohol or tobacco products, have never had any form of credit card, have never taken any class post high school, and those are just a few.
It makes NO sense to me that in order to exercise a STATE right, like drive on the roadway, you MUST show multiple forms of ID. Yet to exercise a FEDERAL, a Constitutional right, it doesn't matter if you are who you say you are, AND it doesn't matter if scammers or people otherwise prohibited from voting, vote. A true philosophical absurdity.
I do think we are slow to restore rights to SOME felons. I'd like to see a system where the restoration process is commensurate with the amount of sentence actually served. Someone gets 10 years and serves it day for day, they've paid the debt they owed and ought to have voting rights restored. But they get sentenced to 10 and serve 18 months because of overcrowding and "good behavior" while under strict supervision... naaawwww, that person ought not expect his rights to be restored right away. Maybe after 75% of their probation is served, providing it's been squeeky clean. But to just hand this over to the federal government for them to try and make one policy that fits all is a certain recipe for them to make a jumbled mess that suits only the most vocal minority and makes no sense in every other case.
At least Rand had the courtesy to make his leftward leap early enough for voters to assimilate that information. Now we have a better idea of how firmly this guy will hold to other things like gun control or taxation. Seems like it's all negotiable if only some group will say they like him.
Rand Pauls veers off party line
Anyone, and I mean anyone, who tries to tell me that having an ID card to vote is an imposition is, ipso facto, an idiot. For that to be true, I have to believe the same supposedly impositioned people have no bank account, never travel on an airplane or AMTRACK, never get a driver's license, never stay in a hotel or motel, never purchase a firearm, never purchase alcohol or tobacco products, have never had any form of credit card, have never taken any class post high school, and those are just a few.
It makes NO sense to me that in order to exercise a STATE right, like drive on the roadway, you MUST show multiple forms of ID. Yet to exercise a FEDERAL, a Constitutional right, it doesn't matter if you are who you say you are, AND it doesn't matter if scammers or people otherwise prohibited from voting, vote. A true philosophical absurdity.
I do think we are slow to restore rights to SOME felons. I'd like to see a system where the restoration process is commensurate with the amount of sentence actually served. Someone gets 10 years and serves it day for day, they've paid the debt they owed and ought to have voting rights restored. But they get sentenced to 10 and serve 18 months because of overcrowding and "good behavior" while under strict supervision... naaawwww, that person ought not expect his rights to be restored right away. Maybe after 75% of their probation is served, providing it's been squeeky clean. But to just hand this over to the federal government for them to try and make one policy that fits all is a certain recipe for them to make a jumbled mess that suits only the most vocal minority and makes no sense in every other case.
At least Rand had the courtesy to make his leftward leap early enough for voters to assimilate that information. Now we have a better idea of how firmly this guy will hold to other things like gun control or taxation. Seems like it's all negotiable if only some group will say they like him.